AI Governance & Assurance Advisory · Triodian

Advisory · AI governance and assurance

Who runs your AI governance?

Twenty-six seconds, silent: how Triodian advisory runs the method inside the open-source app suite

The app suite, run with your counsel and your board.

Every Triodian engagement runs in the app suite, which is open source under Apache 2.0 and free to self-host. Advisory is Triodian running it with you: we take each engagement through its phases and gates, route the legal questions to your counsel in writing, and carry out the independent check before anything is handed over.

There are two routes in, one for regulated entities and one for companies outside prudential regulation, and standing support once the register exists.

Book a walk-through → The two routes ↓ See the app suite

Not legal advice. Triodian records positions and states what documents show. Whether anything meets a legal obligation, and what your duties require, are questions for your counsel.

What you walk away with

A matter brief for counsel · a board minute and a 90-day action list · an AI risk appetite statement with its tolerances and triggers · a finding for each place AI acts, naming the evidence it lacks and who owns the gap · the hand-back list.

Open source, and run for you

Run the suite yourself, or have us run it with you.

Run it yourself

  • The suite is open source under Apache 2.0. Self-host it in your own environment, free.
  • Each app opens on a worked example, so your team can learn the method before using it on a live matter.
  • If you rely on it, you can help keep it maintained.

Support the project →

Run it with Triodian

  • We take each engagement through its phases. Anything made before its gate is met stays marked draft.
  • Legal questions go to your counsel in writing. Findings pass a legal-line check and counsel review.
  • An independent check runs before hand-over. You hold the register and the findings.

Book a walk-through →

How to engage

Two routes in, by who you are.

Each step is one part of the suite, and each feeds the next. Start where you are: a route can begin at any step whose inputs already exist.

Regulated entities

Available now

Banks, insurers and funds. The board’s appetite sets the limits each assessment tests against, so every finding names the missing evidence and the limit it falls short of. Regulated entities →

01 · OBLIGATIONS

Obligations Atlas →

Free, in the browser

The sources in scope and a matter brief, with the questions counsel needs to decide.

02 · DIRECTION

AI Board Direction →

One workshop and one board meeting

A board minute, a 90-day action list and an automated-decision worklist for counsel.

03 · APPETITE

AI Risk Appetite →

Two to four weeks

The appetite statement, the tolerance and trigger schedule, and the calibration the assessment reads.

04 · ASSESSMENT

AI Use Assessment →

Three to four weeks

A finding per arrangement, including inside providers, the independent check and the hand-back list.

Companies outside prudential regulation

Available now

Board Direction runs standalone, and the board’s position on confidentiality feeds the deal assessment. General companies →

01 · DIRECTION

AI Board Direction →

One workshop and one board meeting

Where the board wants AI, what it rules out and what it expects to hear, with a board minute and a 90-day action list.

02 · CONFIDENTIALITY

AI Confidentiality Exposure Assessment →

Two weeks, through counsel

A finding per channel by which deal information could reach an external model, a 90-day plan, and the residual gap marked.

Standing support

Available now

Once the register exists, it has to stay true. A senior Triodian specialist two to three days a week keeps the register current, re-runs the checks when an obligation, the appetite or a provider changes, routes new questions to counsel, and supports the accountable officer through each quarter.

Australia · before 10 December 2026

Automated decisions, ready for disclosure

Board Direction’s automated-decision worklist, then the AI Use Assessment scoped to those decisions: which decisions are automated, the data each one uses, and where the evidence falls short. The disclosure questions go to your counsel in writing, and counsel drafts any privacy-policy wording. The Australian position →

Why now

What your supervisors and customers now expect.

Each jurisdiction has its own page, with the regulatory position as at a stated date and reviewed by counsel each quarter.

Australia →

Board oversight of AI inside providers, and automated-decision disclosure from 10 December 2026.

Singapore →

Where AI sits on the supervisor’s path, and what providers will be asked to show.

Canada →

AI models come into model risk scope on 1 May 2027, including the ones your providers run.

European Union →

The evidence question already has statute behind it.

Groups with many supervisors →

One group framework, examined by every supervisor. The earliest date sets the clock.

Outside prudential regulation →

Funders, insurers and deal counterparties asking what your AI can show.

For law firms and board advisers

Run the suite in your own engagements, with Triodian as the independent reviewer, or add a named Triodian specialist to a client matter with a two-week start.

How partners work with Triodian →

Who you work with

Triodian was founded to make AI governance enforceable: to turn policy and institutional constraints into controls that can be checked at the point an AI system acts, with evidence of the decision afterwards. Building those controls is how we know which ones organisations struggle to evidence.

Our founder brings more than 20 years in enterprise technology and transformation across Commonwealth and state government and regulated institutions. About Triodian →

See it working

Book a walk-through on a worked example.

Thirty minutes in the app suite, so the decision rests on the method, not on a slide.

Book a walk-through →

Fees

Fixed fees, in Australian dollars.

Each engagement is a fixed fee, agreed before it starts. The fee covers the engagement run in the app suite with your counsel and board, the independent check and the hand-over. Legal advice is your counsel's, billed by them.

EngagementShapeFee
AI Obligations AtlasWeb app, REST API and MCP serverFree
AI Board DirectionOne workshop and one board meetingA$30,000
AI Risk AppetiteTwo board sessionsA$45,000
AI Use AssessmentThree to four weeks, with independent reviewA$75,000
AI Confidentiality Exposure AssessmentTwo weeks, through counselA$40,000
Standing supportTwo to three days a week, by the quarterA$18,000 a month

Fees are fixed at engagement for large organisations, exclude GST or VAT and travel, and are reviewed each quarter. Scope and fee for smaller organisations on request. The same engagements are priced in Australian, Singapore and Canadian dollars and in euros on each jurisdiction page.