Governed Application · The enforcement point
Where a verdict becomes an action.
The assistant itself, every exchange gated on prompt and on response before anyone sees it.
What this seat does.
Gated on prompt and response
Two gate strips fire per exchange, use-auth and inbound-disclosure, then outbound-disclosure and prohibited-activity.
Live intent trajectory
The path grows a segment per exchange, so the projection cone can reach the drift region before a breach.
A signal about use, not the person
The inferred heading is a signal about the pattern of use, never a judgement of the person.
Why the Suite is different
Deterministic, not advisory.
A per-output verdict against a signed library, not a probabilistic guardrail.
Proof a third party can check.
Every output carries a compliance token bound to a named library version.
Remediation, not just refusal.
A bounded convergence loop brings a divergent output back into bounds where it can.
Separation of duties as architecture.
Author, operator, oversight and inspector are separated by keys and bounded views.
One Suite, six seats
Use-Governance Monitor →
Semantic Library →
Enforcement Engine →
Governed Application (you are here)
Oversight Report →
Inspector / Verify →
This governs information use and disclosure. It does not govern targeting, fire-control, or any actuation of force. Demonstration scenario; the depicted units are fictional; illustrative data only.