Apps for AI Risk Appetite, Use and Confidentiality · Triodian

Apps · available now

The apps that run each engagement, and hold your register.

Each Triodian engagement runs in its own app, so every decision, finding and question to counsel is recorded in one place with its source. All three are available now, and we will walk you through each one on a worked example.

Available nowDemo on request

For boards and CROs

AI Risk Appetite

Records

  • The board's eight decisions, as its own positions
  • Ten checks across the decisions
  • No view on what the appetite should be

Produces

  • An AI risk appetite statement
  • A tolerance and trigger schedule
  • The calibration set the assessment reads

Worked example: a fictional insurer. No client data leaves the browser.

Available nowDemo on request

For assessors, counsel and CROs

AI Use Assessment

Records

  • One register entry per place AI acts, including inside providers
  • The seven questions for each arrangement
  • One obtainability test per evidence rung
  • Legal questions routed to counsel in writing

Produces

  • A finding per arrangement
  • An independent check before hand-over
  • The hand-back list of gaps and owners

Worked example: a fictional insurer and its providers. Eight phases, each with a gate; anything made before its gate is met is marked draft.

Available nowDemo on request

For counsel and deal teams

AI Confidentiality Exposure Assessment

Records

  • Seven channel kinds across the company's estate, its advisers' and personal devices
  • The five questions put to each channel
  • Indicative, required and obtainable rungs on the non-egress ladder

Produces

  • A finding per channel
  • A 90-day plan from what exists
  • The residual gap, marked, and a technical annex

Worked example: a fictional deal under a code name. Run through counsel under privilege; no deal content enters the register.

How they connect

The same board decision carries from the boardroom to the boundary.

The appetite sets the operating points that controls enforce, so a finding names exactly which rung of evidence is missing and against which limit.

01

Appetite

The board sets authority, evidence and triggers in the AI Risk Appetite app.

02

Assessment

The AI Use Assessment app tests each arrangement against that calibration.

03

Finding

Each gap is named, with the evidence rung it needs and its owner.

04

Fix

You choose who fills it. A Triodian control is one option, decided separately.

You hold your register

You hold a licence to your own register and findings. The method and the apps remain Triodian's.

Aggregate evidence only

No customer data, no deal content and no individual decisions enter the apps.

Drafts to counsel first

Legal questions are routed in writing, and findings are gated by a legal-line check and counsel review.

See them working

Book a walk-through of the apps.

Thirty minutes on a worked example, so the decision rests on the method, not on a slide.

Book a demo →